Politics5/23/2026•The Guardian

Reeves’s tax cut on children’s meals a political ‘soundbite’, say restaurateurs

Reeves’s tax cut on children’s meals a political ‘soundbite’, say restaurateurs

Chancellor’s measure to help families save money during summer holidays ‘won’t make any difference’ Cutting tax on children’s meals is a political “soundbite” that will make little difference to families or businesses, restaurateurs have said. This week, Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, announced a temporary reduction in VAT on the children’s menu in restaurants from 20% to 5% between June and September, in order to help families with the cost of living crisis and offer a boost to the hospitality sector. It is part of a package including free bus journeys for under-16s in England in August and cuts to import taxes on some basic foods under a “Great British summer savings” campaign. But there are questions over how much of the savings will be passed on to consumers, with many restaurateurs claiming children’s food is often already sold at a loss. Will Murray, the owner of London restaurant Fallow, serves up a children’s menu featuring pizza, cheeseburgers and grilled fish from between £5 and £10. “It’s such a small soundbite that won’t make any difference,” he said. “Most kids’ food is already discounted at the cost of the restaurant anyway: the V

Source: For the complete article, please visit the original source link below.

Related Articles

Bloomberg logo
🏛️ Politics5h ago•1 min read

Trump Warns Norway He Won’t Forget Nobel Peace Prize Snub

Bloomberg logo
🏛️ Politics7h ago•1 min read

Charlamagne Tha God on Netflix Deal, Midterm Elections, Mental Health

Bloomberg logo
🏛️ Politics8h ago•1 min read

Trump: Putin To Release Diesel Into Global Market

Bloomberg logo
🏛️ Politics8h ago•1 min read

Bessent Will Likely Cut US Long Bond Sales Next Month, Says Citi

Bloomberg logo
🏛️ Politics8h ago•1 min read

DOJ Scrutinizes Binance Compliance With 2023 Settlement Deal

Bloomberg logo
🏛️ Politics8h ago•1 min read

Post Says White House Press Limits Could ‘Deform’ Coverage