Oregon's Dan Lanning questions perceived Big Ten schedule disparities: 'It's almost like they didn't want us'

The article discusses concerns raised by Oregon head coach Dan Lanning and USC head coach Lincoln Riley regarding perceived disparities in the Big Ten conference's scheduling practices. Lanning questioned whether the Big Ten "didn't want" Oregon, citing the team's challenging schedule that includes games against both Ohio State and Michigan. Riley also voiced concerns over the conference's scheduling, suggesting that there may be ulterior motives behind the decisions. The article highlights the ongoing debate around the fairness and transparency of conference scheduling, particularly in the context of the recent realignment and expansion of major college football leagues. Lanning and Riley's comments reflect the broader tensions and competitive pressures faced by top-tier programs as they navigate the changing landscape of college sports. The article provides a concise summary of the key points, focusing on the main concerns raised by the two head coaches regarding the perceived disparities in the Big Ten's scheduling practices. It avoids taking a stance on the issue and presents the information in an unbiased manner.