Net neutrality advocates won’t appeal loss, say they don’t trust Supreme Court
The article discusses the decision of net neutrality advocates to not appeal their recent loss in court. They have decided not to pursue the case further, citing a lack of trust in the Supreme Court's ability to make a fair and unbiased ruling. The advocates believe that the Supreme Court has shown "hostility toward sound legal reasoning" and that the court's current composition makes it unlikely that they would rule in favor of net neutrality. They argue that the court's recent decisions have demonstrated a bias against upholding established legal principles. The article suggests that the advocates have concluded that an appeal to the Supreme Court would be futile and potentially result in a further setback for the net neutrality cause. Instead, they appear to be shifting their focus to other avenues, such as legislative or regulatory efforts, to try to preserve the principles of net neutrality.
Note: This is an AI-generated summary of the original article. For the full story, please visit the source link below.
