Organization

Trump administration

Mentioned in 121 articles · tracked across 3 developing stories

Developing stories

Trump Questions UK-US Special Relationship Status
10 updates
President Trump has stated that the UK-US "special relationship" is "not what it was," raising concerns about the strength of the alliance between the two countries. The UK government has responded by maintaining that the nations continue to work closely together despite Trump's assessment. Traditionally viewed as a cornerstone of both nations' foreign policies, the partnership appears to be undergoing challenges or evolution. The article does not detail specific tensions or the precise reasons behind Trump's remarks, but indicates a divergence between the UK government's position and the US President's evaluation of the current state of their relationship.
Kristi Noem Questioned on Housing, Lewandowski Relationship
1 updates
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem faced questioning from the House Judiciary Committee regarding multiple allegations of misconduct. Key issues examined included her living arrangements and relationship with former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, allegations of obstructing a watchdog investigation, and awarding a no-bid contract to a newly established company. The committee also raised concerns about delayed hurricane relief efforts and the firing of a Coast Guard pilot over a misplaced blanket. The hearing reflected broader scrutiny of Noem's leadership and management practices within the Department of Homeland Security, with committee members pressing for explanations and accountability regarding her departmental decisions and personal conduct.
Judge Orders Halt to IEEPA Tariff Calculations for Refunds
2 updates
A US judge has ordered the Trump administration to stop calculating tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to facilitate refunds to affected companies and individuals. This order follows a Supreme Court ruling that struck down the president's global tariffs as unconstitutional. The decision aims to simplify and expedite the refund process for those who paid IEEPA tariffs, particularly on Chinese imports. The ruling is considered a victory for businesses that challenged the legality of these tariffs and sought compensation for payments made under the administration's trade policies.