Barrister found to have used AI to prepare for hearing after citing ‘fictitious’ cases
A barrister, Chowdhury Rahman, was found to have used AI software, similar to ChatGPT, to prepare for an immigration tribunal hearing. The judge ruled that Rahman cited cases that were "entirely fictitious" or "wholly irrelevant," wasting the tribunal's time. Rahman not only used AI to conduct his legal research but also failed to properly verify the accuracy of the information generated by the AI. This was seen as a breach of professional conduct, as lawyers are expected to thoroughly research and validate the information they present in court. The incident highlights the potential risks and ethical concerns surrounding the use of AI in legal proceedings, where accuracy and credibility are of utmost importance.
Source: For the complete article, please visit the original source link below.
