Trump-Xi summit: What wasn't said might matter the most
The most revealing thing about the summit in Washington may be what the two leaders did not say - and what we still don't know.
In late 2003, Supreme Court justices were prepared to reject a case involving then-Vice President Dick Cheneyâs attempt to keep private politically sensitive records from his energy policy task force that had recommended opening more federal lands to oil and gas drilling. But then-Justice Antonin Scalia launched into action â in moves concealed from the public at the time. Scalia has long been linked to the dispute. He went on a long-planned duck hunting trip with Cheney three weeks after the court announced it would hear the case, generating one of the most enduring controversies over Supreme Court ethics. Once-confidential materials reviewed by CNN show how Scalia drove the decision to hear the Cheney appeal in the first place. The Sierra Club, one of the groups that sued the Cheney task force for documents, challenged Scaliaâs impartiality and formally requested that he recuse himself. Scalia responded with a memorable 21-page statement refusing to take himself out of the dispute over lobbyists and other outsiders who may have met with the task force. Scaliaâs defiant statement included a mix of hobnobbing history in Washingtonâs upper echelons â âJustice (William)

Jun 1, 2026 → Jun 1, 2026
In late 2003, Supreme Court justices were prepared to reject a case involving then-Vice President Dick Cheneyâs attempt to keep private politically sensitive records from his energy policy task force that had recommended opening more…
Read original at CNN →1 updates from 1 source.
In late 2003, Supreme Court justices were prepared to reject a case involving then-Vice President Dick Cheneyâs attempt to keep private politically sensitive records from his energy policy task force that had…
Read original at CNN →What this story stands on. Tier 0 is a primary record or the subject's own words; higher tiers must be attributed, never stated as bare fact.
In late 2003, Supreme Court justices were prepared to reject a case involving then-Vice President Dick Cheneyâs attempt to keep private politically sensitive records from his energy policy task force that had recommended opening more…
View source →Tier key: T0 = Primary source · T1 = Wire · T2 = Outlet report · T3 = Commentary
The most revealing thing about the summit in Washington may be what the two leaders did not say - and what we still don't know.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2026 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least…
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2026 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least…
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2026 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least…
The first mistake was appointing the peer despite his links to Jeffrey Epstein. The next would be claiming his security risks were properly managed It is telling that the person…
PM’s chief secretary Darren Jones defends decision and says next release will not be until next month Ministers have been accused of a cover-up after admitting they have withheld…