Google gets off easy in the most significant monopoly case since Microsoft trial

The article discusses the recent antitrust lawsuit filed against Google by the U.S. Justice Department. The lawsuit alleges that Google's dominance in the search and advertising markets is a result of anticompetitive practices, such as exclusive deals with device manufacturers and web browsers. However, the article suggests that the proposed remedies are not as severe as the Justice Department had hoped for. While the lawsuit seeks to break up Google's core business, the actual outcome may be more limited, focusing on specific practices rather than a full-scale structural change. The article notes that the case is the most significant antitrust action against a tech giant since the Microsoft trial in the 1990s. It highlights the challenges the government faces in successfully dismantling the entrenched power of large technology companies, which have become deeply integrated into the daily lives of consumers. Overall, the article suggests that while the lawsuit represents a significant step in addressing Google's market dominance, the final outcome may not be as impactful as the Justice Department had initially sought.