Judge unhappy with FCC’s “vague and uninformative” response to DOGE lawsuit

A federal judge has expressed dissatisfaction with the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) response to a lawsuit related to Dogecoin (DOGE). The plaintiffs, who filed the lawsuit, allege that the FCC violated the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by failing to provide relevant documents about DOGE. The judge stated that the FCC's response was "vague and uninformative," and ordered the agency to provide more detailed information about the steps it took to search for and produce the requested documents. The plaintiffs are seeking to obtain these documents, which they believe will shed light on the FCC's involvement or knowledge of DOGE-related activities. The lawsuit is part of a broader effort to uncover information about the regulatory oversight and treatment of DOGE, a popular cryptocurrency. The judge's criticism of the FCC's response suggests that the court is taking the plaintiffs' concerns seriously and expects the agency to provide a more comprehensive and transparent account of its actions.